Simulate AI-powered next best action recommendations for HCP engagement. Select HCP attributes to receive optimized channel, timing, and content recommendations based on rule-based weighted scoring models used in leading pharma omnichannel platforms.
The NBA simulator uses a rule-based weighted scoring engine that evaluates HCP attributes across five dimensions: engagement tier, preferred channel, recency of contact, prescription status, and access level. Each combination produces a scored recommendation with confidence level and alternative actions.
Configure the HCP profile to generate a personalized next best action recommendation with channel, timing, content, and confidence scoring.
Get our free guide on implementing next best action engines in pharma CRM systems with scoring models, rulesets, and integration patterns.
Next Best Action (NBA) is an AI-driven recommendation engine that determines the optimal next interaction for each HCP based on their profile, behavior, preferences, and current engagement state. In pharmaceutical commercial operations, NBA engines analyze hundreds of variables to recommend the right channel, timing, content, and frequency for each HCP interaction, moving beyond rules-based segmentation to individual-level personalization.
NBA engines use a combination of rule-based logic, machine learning models, and real-time data to generate recommendations. The rule-based layer encodes known best practices (e.g., no-see HCPs should not receive rep visit recommendations). The machine learning layer optimizes based on historical response patterns, predicting which combination of channel, timing, and content will maximize engagement probability for each individual HCP.
Engagement Tier
Classifies HCPs based on their cumulative engagement across all channels. High-engagement HCPs respond well to rep visits and webinars. Medium-engagement HCPs may benefit from email nurturing. Low-engagement HCPs need re-engagement campaigns with value-driven content. Unengaged HCPs require awareness-building tactics before direct sales approaches.
Preferred Channel
Each HCP has demonstrated channel preferences based on historical interaction data. Some HCPs consistently respond to in-person visits while others prefer digital channels. NBA engines weight the preferred channel heavily but also consider channel fatigue (avoiding overuse of any single channel).
Recency of Contact
The time since the last meaningful interaction affects both channel selection and urgency. HCPs contacted within the past week should not receive another outreach unless triggered by a specific event. HCPs with 3+ months of silence may need a re-engagement sequence before promotional content.
Prescription Status
The HCP's current prescribing behavior determines content strategy. New-to-therapy HCPs need clinical data and dosing information. HCPs considering a switch need comparative efficacy data. Stable prescribers may respond to patient support resources. Lapsed prescribers need win-back messaging with new data or formulary updates.
Access Level
HCP access restrictions fundamentally shape channel strategy. Full-access HCPs can receive any channel. Limited-access HCPs may accept rep visits by appointment only, favoring digital touchpoints. No-see HCPs must be engaged exclusively through digital channels (email, portal, approved digital content).
Leading pharma companies implement NBA within their CRM platforms (Veeva, IQVIA, Salesforce Health Cloud). The implementation process involves: defining the scoring model with business rules, integrating data feeds (CRM interactions, Rx data, claims, digital engagement), building the recommendation engine (rules + ML model), creating UI components for reps to view and act on recommendations, and establishing feedback loops to continuously improve model accuracy. Most organizations start with a rules-based approach and layer in machine learning as they accumulate response data.
How accurate are NBA recommendations?
Production NBA engines in pharma typically achieve 60-75% accuracy in predicting HCP engagement, compared to 30-40% for random channel selection. This simulator uses simplified rule-based logic that approximates the decision framework; production systems use additional data points including Rx history, claims data, and real-time digital engagement signals.
What data do I need to implement NBA?
Minimum data requirements include: CRM interaction history (channel, date, outcome), HCP master data (specialty, tier, access), and prescription data (TRx, NRx). Advanced implementations add digital engagement data (email opens, website visits, portal logins), claims data, and formulary status.
How does NBA differ from traditional segmentation?
Traditional segmentation groups HCPs into segments and applies the same strategy to all HCPs in a segment. NBA treats each HCP as an individual and generates a unique recommendation based on their specific attributes and behavior history. NBA also considers temporal context (when was the last contact, what happened) rather than static profile data alone.
How often should NBA recommendations be updated?
Best practice is to recalculate NBA recommendations after each interaction (closed-loop) so the next recommendation reflects the most recent engagement outcome. For planning purposes, NBA scores are typically recalculated weekly or monthly using batch data refreshes of Rx and engagement data.
Analyze multi-channel marketing attribution and channel contribution to prescriptions.
Calculate Attribution →Assess your organization's omnichannel marketing maturity level and readiness.
Assess Maturity →Evaluate your organization's readiness for AI-powered commercial analytics and NBA.
Assess Readiness →